When you're experiencing issues with your current roof, you may be wondering if it is better to restore or replace the entire roof. Roof restoration involves attending to particular areas of the roof that are not functioning as expected, and carrying out modifications to those areas so they can become functional again. For example, the lower roofing surfaces may need to be fixed for leaks and breakages, or the entire roof may need to be sealed due to leaking.
On the other hand, roof replacement involves installing an entirely new roof on the premises. The old roofing material needs to be removed and the new roof installed in its place. So which option is better for you? Read on to find out.
When it comes to the cost incurred for the job, roof restoration is more cost-effective than a complete replacement. This is because restoration is a more targeted approach, addressing only the areas of the roof that are having problems. You can therefore be more efficient in the materials that you need to buy and the labor costs that you need to incur.
Roof replacement is a more holistic approach where the entire roof is replaced with a new one. This is a more expensive process in terms of labor and material costs.
Lifespan of the roof
While it is true that roof replacement will last longer than a restoration, a restoration also offers an excellent lifespan for your roof. In fact, a commercial roof that would typically last for 20 years can enjoy an extra 10-15 years of life after restoration. Roof restoration therefore enables you to get more out of your existing roof before you tear it all off.
In a world where environmental sustainability is a top concern, roof restoration offers the best channel for minimizing waste in materials used during your roofing work.
A restored roof often reuses many of the original materials and results in very little wastage. On the other hand, when a roof is replaced, all the old roofing material is disposed of in landfills and other waste management areas.
Scope of work
Roof restorations can be carried out much faster than replacements. A restoration will therefore lead to less inconvenience to people's daily routine at the premises. In addition, people are less likely to put off a roof restoration because it is easier to carry out and more cost-effective. A roof replacement is often a longer-term process that tends to be procrastinated.
While both processes are great for fixing roofing issues, homeowners should weigh the pros and cons of each to determine what is the best option for them.